Radio Nederland Wereldomroep

English > The State We're In > Themes

Land ownership in South Africa

by Eric Beauchemin

07-03-2008

South Africa's pre-Mandela regime brought about one of the most racially skewed land distributions in the world. Since the collapse of apartheid in 1994, the black majority government has been trying to implement land reform, but are new injustices being created by righting past wrongs?

In South Africa, one of the most intractable legacies of white-minority rule is the right to land. After the first Dutch settlers arrived in the Cape in the 1600s, they started taking over native peoples' lands. Whites gradually expropriated more and more land, and by the early 20th century, blacks had been squeezed into reservations that amounted to only 13 percent of South Africa's territory.

 Eric Ralapelle
                              Eric Ralapelle
The present controversy over land redistribution is being played out across the country, including the province of Limpopo, formerly known as Transvaal. South Africa's northern-most province is a very rich agricultural region, and because of its varying and distinct climates, it produces a wide range of crops, from tropical fruits and vegetables to cereals.

In Letaba District in Limpopo Province, claims have been submitted against 98.8 percent of the white-owned farmland. One of the claimants is Eric Ralapelle. He is also the chairman of the Landless People's Movement, the LPM.

For the past decade he has been fighting to get back his people's land, which he says was stolen from them in 1913 with the introduction of the Native Land Act.

Graves
Mr Ralapelle says he and other blacks can prove that the land is theirs.

"We managed to find some graves. Some old buildings are still there too. You'll find the farmer has just planted some bananas or mangoes. But the evidence is still there."

Even though South Africa has had black majority rule for almost 15 years now, it has been difficult for Mr Ralapelle and the other 19 million landless and poor blacks to get their land back. The post-apartheid government couldn't simply confiscate the land, because agriculture is one of the foundations of the South African economy.

Land claims court
But land reform has been a government priority since 1994. The authorities have even set up a Land Claims Court and Commission to ensure that the black majority gets the land back, but the process has been slow, admits Mr Ralapelle. He says:

"The problem is the pace in which the government is processing this thing." There is a pile of work to do, and they don't have the capacity to do that work. You will find that one official is handling more than 20 claims. So it will be hard for them to process that."

Financial problems
Commercial farms require a large amount of capital to purchase seeds, fertilizer and equipment, as well as to pay regular bills for things like electricity and water. The government has promised to give funding to new landowners, but it has been slow in actually handing out the money. As a result, many of the farms that have been reclaimed have collapsed within a year or two.

Mr Ralapelle and the other people in his community are hoping to get their land back in a few weeks' time. He expects to earn more money and also to become the master of his own destiny for the first time in his life. But for him, the most important thing will be that he will finally be able to tend to his ancestors' graves.

The losers
There are winners and losers in South Africa's grand land redistribution. The latter are white farmers, like Theo de Jager. He is the chairman of the Land Affairs committee of AgriSA, an organisation representing small and large-scale commercial farmers. A little over a decade ago, Mr De Jager bought a farm in Limpopo Province. But a few years later, he and his neighbours discovered that claims had been made on their farms.

 Theo de Jager
                             Theo de Jager
There were 26 farms in the district, and during the negotiations with the local tribe and the Department of Land Affairs, the farmers agreed that they would sell half their farms. The land was eventually handed over to 3600 families. Some of the white farmers decided to form joint ventures with the new owners to help them learn how to run a commercial farm, but since then, all 13 farms have collapsed. Last winter, they were burnt down by the previous farm hands, who were angry at having lost their jobs.

A new chapter
Mr De Jager was housebound for three months, but he finally decided to buy another farm. About 80 kilometres from his previous farm he found one that didn't have any claims on it. But six months later disaster struck again. Mr De Jager says:

"When the farm became viable again these claims popped out. When I went to see the land claims commissioner, he explained to me that somebody resigned from his office. After he left the commission, they had to break open a steel cupboard. They found a lot of documents inside including these new claims. The commission did not realise that they had received them prior to the cut-off date in 1998."Here to stay
Mr De Jager still finds it hard to believe that he will have to fight again to keep his land. But he is comforted by the fact that only four individuals have submitted claims. As he puts it, at least three of them must be wrong. Unlike many of his neighbours, who have left the province or emigrated abroad, Mr De Jager plans to stay in Limpopo as a farmer. He says:

"We, the Afrikaners of Dutch descent, have never been alone in Africa. We have been farming with the indigenous people - with the current land claimants - for 350 years now. We will never be alone. So we understand the land hunger."

When asked what he would do if he would lose his farm again, his answer is quite simple. "Buy another one".

 

Tags: AgriSA, apartheid, Land Claims Court and Commission , land reform, Landless People's Movement, Letaba, Limpopo, Native Land Act, South Africa, Transvaal

Reaction(s):


STELLA GOODWIN, 10-10-2008 -

I am half English half-Kenyan and having a white father who was living in Kenya before and after independance l feel that the idea that white farmers should been seen as victims is obsured. The land which the purchased from African governments was originally owned by Africans. In Kenya the British government implimented demands from white settlers to confiscate african land in order to stop them competiting with them commercially and to force them to work on their land. This contradicts the claim that Africans were or are incapable of managing arible land. As there is no social secrurity in Africa the poor will always remain and rely on others for food and help. If you have no job or land you are unable to feed your family. But if you have land you can at least feed yourself. I find it outrageous that the minority of a country can possess the vast major of arible land. It is immoral and a disgrace that it has not been dealt with for so long.


Ricardo J.Caveda, espanamulato@aol.com, 10-03-2008 - U.S.A

Als de blackmensen willen de land hebben, zij moeten naar Zimbawe gaan.De Nederlandse mensen moeten de wits Afrikaaners helpen. Baie Dankie. [If the black people want the land, they should go to Zimbabwe. The Dutch should help the white Afrikaners. Many thanks.]


Give your reaction



Name
E-mail
Hide my email address
Show my email address
URL
City
Country
Comments
  Please type in the letters/numbers in the image below in order to prevent spam.
 
Send a copy of this message to my email address
This is a moderated forum. Reactions may be edited before they appear online.