Radio Nederland Wereldomroep

English > Current Affairs

Half the Dutch want the Queen out of politics

by Philip Smet*

07-01-2008

Queen Beatrix delivers her Christmas speech Half of the Dutch people want the Queen to give up her role as a member of the government. That's the result of a recent poll, instigated by a plea from Geert Wilders of the rightwing Freedom Party. He wants the Head of State to stick to cutting ribbons and stay well away from politics.

Opinion pollster Maurice de Hond asked:
"Do you think the Queen should only have a ceremonial role in the Netherlands and not a political one?"

In April 2007, 41 percent of those asked agreed. Now that has risen to 50 percent.

Historian Thomas van der Dunk had this reaction to the poll result:

"It's certainly a striking outcome. The popularity of the Dutch Royal House rises and falls all the time. But it's remarkable that so many people now think she shouldn't be involved with politics."

Christmas speech
The question is topical because Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders reacted angrily to the recent Christmas Speech, given every year by Queen Beatrix. In her speech, the Head of State pleaded for tolerance, which Mr Wilders saw as an attack on his party. The anti-immigration party takes a strong position against the influence of Islam and the European Union in the Netherlands. Wilders wants to limit the functions of the Head of State to a ceremonial role.

Ministerial Responsibility
The Queen and the ministers together make up the Government. Under the Constitution, which dates from 1848, the ministers and not the monarch are responsible for affairs of government.
 
No legislation can come about without a minister being accountable for it to Parliament. Acts of Parliament and Royal Decrees, the latter not requiring the approval of Parliament, are always signed by the Queen, who thereby gives them the royal assent, and countersigned by a minister who accepts full constitutional responsibility for them.
 
In this way, the Queen exercises her authority as head of state, and the minister his constitutional responsibility.
(Source: Dutch Royal House offical website)
Queen Beatrix is officially a part of the government. But her speeches and actions fall under ministerial control. The only occasion when she has a steering role is during the formation of a new government. And she makes the speech from the throne at the opening of the parliamentary year in September. Its text, outlining policy for the coming year, is drawn up by the government.


History
In 1918, Social-Democratic leader Pieter Jelles Troelstra was still arguing for the abolition of the monarchy. His argument was soundly rejected by practically the whole of Dutch politics and society. Nevertheless, the role of the Royal House is frequently the subject of discussion.

In 2000 Thom de Graaff, leader of the democratic D66 Party, already argued that the Head of State should step out of the government. But he didn't want a purely ceremonial function: the Queen still had a role: "to warn, to encourage, to consult." De Graaf's report created a lot of excitement amongst the public and politicians. But the country still wasn't ready for her to leave the government.

Controversial
Historian Von der Dunk has looked at the political background of the people who were polled. The supporters of the centre parties see little reason to change anything about the monarchy. The people who want change are precisely those who support the Freedom Party (mostly driven by dissatisfaction with politics), the liberal wing of the conservative VVD and, on the left, supporters of the Socialist Party.

"That shows precisely what the problem is in the eyes of many people. Two things that the Royal House supports have become more controversial amongst sections of the population: the multicultural society, and the role of Europe. You can look at it two ways: the Royal House holding on to what it believes in, or the Royal House has socially missed the boat a bit."

The future
The Dutch are no longer such strong supporters of the monarchy that has existed here for less than 200 years. What's remarkable is that even the traditional support of the monarchy, the so-called "Orange Union", distanced itself last year from Princess Máxima, when she said there's no such thing as a single 'Dutch identity'. Even her popularity is under pressure, now that she has expressed a social point of view.

Whether the position of the Head of State will really change in the future, is the big question. Crown Prince Willem-Alexander has said on numerous occasions that he only wants minor changes. The not-too-distant future will no doubt reveal what the Dutch really want when Willem-Alexander's mother decides its time to abdicate.

* RNW translation (as)

Tags: Dutch constitution, Dutch government, Dutch politics, Dutch Royal Family, Geert Wilders, Prince Willem-Alexander, Princess Maxima, Queen Beatrix

Reaction(s):


Jan, 16-01-2008 - Netherlands

It is time to get rid of "royal families." I read a quote once. It said something like, "I want to see the last king strangled with the intestines of the last priest." Hierarchical institutions have had their day. It is time for freedom.


Sandra, 09-01-2008 - netherlands

You two Americans who posted on here do not speak for me or many other Americans that I know who support Geert Wilders. You should be grateful that such a courageous person as Geert Wilders risks his own life to defend our western cultures and freedom.


Harold, forget_republicans@yahoo.com.au, 09-01-2008 - Australia

It is only too obvious that Geert Wilders is running a campaign against the political role of the Dutch Monarch because he sees Queen Beatrix as an opponent of his ideas. If this assumption is correct doesn't matter. How can an appeal to tolerance by the Queen be criticised? Does Mr. Wilders promote intolerance? It is a Monarch's duty is to warn of wrong developments. Queen Beatrix is a marvellous Queen and the Dutch should be proud of her. She is an excellent example how Monarchy in the 21st century works and we want to see more of these Monarchs, not less.


BF, 08-01-2008 - USA

If the Queen were advocating the racial superiority of Germanic tribes, or of the royal families (so frequently identical), I could see the problem... but objections to a plea for tolerance seems a bit fascistic. Looks like Holland has found its equivalent of America's Rush Limbaugh in Geert Wilders, but with extra hair and more comical-looking. From a distance, it looks like liberalism in Holland under the EU has intentionally and strategically been allowed to get out of control in order to create a conservative backlash.


Evert C. Weidner, 07-01-2008 - USA

I would say that Geert Wilders is no better than the radicals he criticizes with his extreme ideas and pronouncements. Now he feels justified to criticize queen Beatrix. How much life experience has he yet accumulated, if any, and were will it end with this nonsense. As the king of Spain has correctly said to Chavez," Why don't you just shut up"


Nora, 07-01-2008 -

It's a pity controversy appears at the end of a highly beneficial reign for The Netherlands. Monarchy might have been here for only 200 years, but the House of Orange is such an inseparable part of the country's history since its beginnings. I, for one, want to see Queen Amalia retire in old age in favour of her son/daughter, provided I make it to 100 years...


Give your reaction



Name
E-mail
Hide my email address
Show my email address
URL
City
Country
Comments
  Please type in the letters/numbers in the image below in order to prevent spam.
 
Send a copy of this message to my email address
This is a moderated forum. Reactions may be edited before they appear online.